feat: CTA orientação no WhatsApp para indecisos (MAN-127)
All checks were successful
CI / static (pull_request) Successful in 2m25s
CI / unit (pull_request) Successful in 3m4s
CI / feature (pull_request) Successful in 2m53s
CI / container (pull_request) Successful in 1m13s
CI / browser (pull_request) Successful in 5m58s

Banda de modalidades passa a abrir wa.me com mensagem distinta (fallback /briefing). Glossário canônico vive em SPEC.md §8.0.

Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
This commit is contained in:
2026-08-13 23:16:05 -03:00
parent dfd9763029
commit 70d19a7c55
9 changed files with 122 additions and 48 deletions

View File

@@ -1,51 +1,28 @@
# Domain Docs
How the engineering skills should consume this repo's domain documentation when exploring the codebase.
How engineering skills should consume this repo's domain documentation.
## Before exploring, read these
## Single source of truth
- **`CONTEXT.md`** at the repo root, or
- **`CONTEXT-MAP.md`** at the repo root if it exists — it points at one `CONTEXT.md` per context. Read each one relevant to the topic.
- **`docs/adr/`** — read ADRs that touch the area you're about to work in. In multi-context repos, also check `src/<context>/docs/adr/` for context-scoped decisions.
**`SPEC.md` §8** (especially **§8.0 Linguagem ubíqua**) is the glossary and domain model for Amare. There is no root `CONTEXT.md` on purpose — do not create one. Prefer `SPEC.md` over Linear copy or OpenSpec prose when terms conflict.
If any of these files don't exist, **proceed silently**. Don't flag their absence; don't suggest creating them upfront. The `/domain-modeling` skill (reached via `/grill-with-docs` and `/improve-codebase-architecture`) creates them lazily when terms or decisions actually get resolved.
Also useful:
## File structure
- **`PRODUCT.md`** — positioning and audience (not the glossary)
- **`openspec/specs/`** — current capability contracts
- **`docs/adr/README.md`** — index only; ADR-001010 live in `SPEC.md` §21
Single-context repo (most repos):
## Before exploring
```
/
├── CONTEXT.md
├── docs/adr/
│ ├── 0001-event-sourced-orders.md
│ └── 0002-postgres-for-write-model.md
└── src/
```
Multi-context repo (presence of `CONTEXT-MAP.md` at the root):
```
/
├── CONTEXT-MAP.md
├── docs/adr/ ← system-wide decisions
└── src/
├── ordering/
│ ├── CONTEXT.md
│ └── docs/adr/ ← context-specific decisions
└── billing/
├── CONTEXT.md
└── docs/adr/
```
1. Read `SPEC.md` §8.0 for vocabulary; skim §5.1 for public routes and §8.2+ for persistence shape when relevant.
2. If a skill expects `CONTEXT.md` / `CONTEXT-MAP.md` and finds neither, **proceed using `SPEC.md` §8** — do not invent a parallel glossary file.
## Use the glossary's vocabulary
When your output names a domain concept (in an issue title, a refactor proposal, a hypothesis, a test name), use the term as defined in `CONTEXT.md`. Don't drift to synonyms the glossary explicitly avoids.
When output names a domain concept (issue title, refactor, hypothesis, test name), use the term as defined in `SPEC.md` §8.0. Don't drift to synonyms the glossary explicitly avoids (`_Avoid_`).
If the concept you need isn't in the glossary yet, that's a signal — either you're inventing language the project doesn't use (reconsider) or there's a real gap (note it for `/domain-modeling`).
If the concept isn't in §8.0 yet, either you're inventing language the project doesn't use (reconsider) or there's a real gap — resolve it by updating `SPEC.md` §8.0 via `/grill-with-docs` / domain-modeling, not by adding `CONTEXT.md`.
## Flag ADR conflicts
If your output contradicts an existing ADR, surface it explicitly rather than silently overriding:
> _Contradicts ADR-0007 (event-sourced orders) — but worth reopening because…_
If output contradicts an ADR in `SPEC.md` §21, surface it explicitly rather than silently overriding.